THE TASK OF LITERARY THEORY: SMALL SCALE ANALYSIS OR UNIVERSAL GENERALIZATIONS?

Abstract

This article examines the two long-existing contending positions in the task of Literary Theory: whether it should restrict itself to the analysis of specific objects or go beyond that by providing universal generalisations that focus on large scale projects. Having examined various views of scholars, writers and researchers and critics, like Arnold, Richards, Waugh and Bressler, the paper traces the root of literary theory and is able to identify some connections between the two arguments. The study finds that both approaches play significant roles within the contexts they are placed. Both ways are aimed at providing, promoting and upholding the value and relevance of literary theory in particular and the world at large to a greater height. Therefore, the study concludes that both approaches should be used where necessary as there is a contentious relationship between the two that unveils conceptual and empirical yardsticks for analysis. Doing away with one could create an aporia that may lead to the return of the repressed.